Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-05 Thread Chris Bateman
, at 11:11 AM, Chris Bateman chrisb...@gmail.com wrote: Ugh, I forgot about that. Without subclassing - terseness is a very minor drawback, but remapping the interface is a big pain. Could you give us a concrete use case in which remapping the interface is necessary or hard/impossible to do

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Chris Bateman
needs to be postponed. Chris On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/0435.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/0435.html first. On Feb 4, 2015, at 6:43 AM, Chris

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Chris Bateman
at 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Chris Bateman chrisb...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I had noted in that post that wrapping a native element with a custom element was an option

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Chris Bateman
Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Chris Bateman chrisb...@gmail.com wrote: Why don't we just make all input elements support these new attributes we're adding? In my opinion, I'd say because you can't possibly cover every case - what about doing the same kind

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-03 Thread Chris Bateman
elements - so it might be handy to have custom element callbacks to assist with it. Chris On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: On Jan 31, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Chris Bateman chrisb...@gmail.com wrote: The -webkit-appreance CSS is definitely another issue, so here's