I’m not sure I need to be there, but if it’s in Seattle I could attend to
discuss javascript accessibility APIs as part of web components.
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:cwi...@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:47 AM
To: Travis Leithead
Cc: Dimitri Glazkov ; Olli Pettay ; Chaals
McCath
I like this a lot. In my experience, "responsive" is a word with positive
connotations in web development. I agree that these input events are the
corollary to responsive layout.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Peters [mailto:ben.pet...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11
This is a really solid list. Thank you for pulling it together, so we can
start towards a harmonized set of user events.
From: Ben Peters [mailto:ben.pet...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2014 7:28 PM
To: public-editing...@w3.org; Julie Parent; public-indie...@w3.org;
public-webapps
Sub
This looks fine to me too. Thanks for addressing it.
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 4:32 AM
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: Sally Cain; Steven Faulkner; Cynthia Shelly; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
public-webapps
Subject: Re: Request for
ginal Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:50 PM
To: Arthur Barstow
Cc: Cynthia Shelly; public-webapps
Subject: Re: Accessibility requirement
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcos, Cynthi
es [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:50 AM
To: Cynthia Shelly
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Accessibility requirement
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Cynthia Shelly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting...
> My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can
Marcos said
"the reason we have "should" and "may" is to accommodate HTML, which is
not as accessible as it could be. To have "must" would mean that
HTML4.01 could not meet the requirement."
Interesting...
My experience has been that HTML 4.01 can be made accessible if it is carefully
coded. WC
Hi,
I'm a member of wai-pf and wcag, and met some of you at the web apps face to
face in redmond recently. I was reading through the widgets 1.0 requirements
spec, and came across this accessibility requirement. Wondering why only
should and may here, and not must?
R37. Language Accessibilit
