On Dec 29, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
> The pattern of assigning the success continuation after invoking the
> operation seems to be to closely tied to JavaScript’s current
> run-to-completion event handling. But what about future JavaScript
> environments, e.g. a multi-threaded
On Feb 16, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Put it another way, when you spin the event loop, not only does your
> code need to be prepared for anything happening. All functions up the
> call stack also has to. That makes it very ha
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
length as an additional alternative? This would eliminate the need to create a
view when y
On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:53 PM, David Herman wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
>
>> I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
>
> Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
> le
