FWIW, we're working to implement what we call named blocks in Ember.js and
believe this proposal aligns very closely to what our users have been
asking us to build for them.
- Erik
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> This is literally reinventing Selectors at this point. The
Thanks for the mentioning the Ember issue Chris :) I've filed it here:
https://github.com/tildeio/htmlbars/issues/288
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Chris Bateman wrote:
> As an example I made a simple input-based Custom Element which prevents
> alphabetic input, and dropped it in an very simple
*claps for sharing JSBin*
Would love to see more of this on public-webapps when possible :)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> BTW, here's a jsbin that implements yield/transclude using existing Shadow
> DOM plumbing:
>
> http://jsbin.com/pacim/1/edit
>
> :DG<
>
In my mind, promisifying the IndexedDB API would be the highest value thing
to end users.
After using a very early version of localForage (
https://github.com/mozilla/localForage), I started toying with a lower
level, promise-based, API wrapper with my EasyIndexedDB library. Here's
some example us
Hi everyone,
First time caller, long time listener.
>From what I understand, the browser vendors seem to be bundling
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> I think Ryosuke's .add/remove are a better base layer than
> . In fact, is straightforwardly
> implementable / explainable on top of MO + .add/remove, but
> there are several use cases that .add/remove address that are
> difficult or impo
