#2 for sure
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015, 4:52 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I was recently pointed to this StackOverflow thread
> <
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31094454/does-the-shadow-dom-replace-before-and-after/
> >
> which asks what happens to ::before and ::after on shadow hosts, as
> it's n
ss-forms/
>
> Will leaving is= (or whatever we call it) in situ create backward
> compatibility problems later on if/when it changes?
>
> That aside, concentrating efforts on styling native HTML elements makes a
> lot of sense.
>
>
> Léonie
>
> --
> L
place to check with a single consistent style seems like the right
> way to go.
>
> --
> Mike West >, @mikewest
>
> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
> Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
> Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Ge
Would be nice to have this. We only have imperative ways to grab JSON (that
is verified as JSON) . This would give a built in way to grab JSON data. I
do agree with Wilson that we can do this with custom elements but I think
this is much more suited to be a native element or extension of script.
m
