2010/3/27 Marcos Caceres
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki
> wrote:
>
> The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at
> <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc
>
ead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://rishida.net/
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
> > Sent: 19 March 2010 11:49
> > To: Richard Ishida; Add
Hi Marcos,
2010/3/10 Marcos Caceres
> Hi Addison, Richard, and i18 WG,
>
[snip]
>
> Upon reflection on the discussion above, I think the dir attr must
> behave the same as xml:lang - meaning that the value of dir is
> applied to the element, all its attributes, and its child nodes.
>
Correc
Hello Marcos,
in case you are also aiming at support for "other ITS elements and
attributes": you could adapt the following tests from the ITS test suite
http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/
which the ITS Working Group used for attributes at the its:span element.
TRANSLALTE
Local - In
Sour
Hello Dzung,
sorry for jumping in, but from
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2009/dap/api-reqs/Overview-FPWGN.html?rev=1.6&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#gallery
"Exposing metadata is tricky, often giving a choice between creating an
endless ontology or building an open-ended system th
Hello Marcos,
I have no input on your scenarios, but as Mark pointed out, they are not
i18n in the usual sense, rather localization. I am putting the ITS IG into
the loop, maybe they have comments on what scenario is appropriate. Your
usage of bcp 47 is of course appropriate for i18n, and I'm sure
into the Widget Packaging spec [1]. Below I summarize what
draft text I have added thus far. I would really appreciate any
feedback if you think I've gone about specifying what you intended
correctly.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Felix Sasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marc
Hello Marcos,
many people from the i18n core WG are away this week, so there might be
more replies later. This is a personal reply.
Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi, i18n-WG.
In recent feedback we received from Addison Phillips regarding the
Widgets 1.0: Packaging specification, he suggested that We
