e more on the list about
> this topic from the Firefox OS point of view?
>
> Thanks
>
>regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
>
> [1] DAP F2F to be held in Düsseldorf, Germany 4-6 June 2013.
>
> On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:43 PM,
Thanks, Mounir. I've been reading the overview, and I have a lot of
the same reactions Robin did to issues of scope. Based on what I read
in the wiki and in this mail, the scope you have in mind is very
similar to where I think we all agree the use cases of web intents
predominately lie (edit, pick
Done. Thanks for the reality check. :-)
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 02:26 AM, Greg Billock wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Deepanshu Gautam
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please refer to the email thread below
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Deepanshu Gautam
wrote:
> Please refer to the email thread below
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2012May/0054.html
>
> Where a consensus was reached to delete the following statement from the
> Suggestions related text.
>
> "The User Ag
Looks right to me.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 5/8/12 1:11 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> Greg, Tantek, All - I think there is an error in this part of the draft Web
> Intents minutes:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06
>
>
> tante
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Greg Billock wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2012 5:56 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Ch
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> On 3/5/2012 5:56 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
>>
>> Do you see old behavior working something like the following?
>>
>>
>> var blob = new Blob("my new big blob");
>> var keepBlob =
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> **
> Does anybody use registerProtocolHandler in any real sense? Is
> registerContentHandler needed? It seems like Web Intents is an evolution on
> the concept. I don't think we're going to see convergence on those old
> methods. I'm rea
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Rich Tibbett wrote:
> Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>
>> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Rich Tibbett a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi
>>> a.) to register a URL endpoint as an intent provider the user must visit
>>> a web page (presumably hosted by the target devic