Re: Web Intents/Web Activities F2F get-together report

2013-03-22 Thread Greg Billock
e more on the list about > this topic from the Firefox OS point of view? > > Thanks > >regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair, W3C DAP Working Group > > [1] DAP F2F to be held in Düsseldorf, Germany 4-6 June 2013. > > On Mar 21, 2013, at 4:43 PM,

Re: Web Activities: counter-proposal to Web Intents

2012-06-21 Thread Greg Billock
Thanks, Mounir. I've been reading the overview, and I have a lot of the same reactions Robin did to issues of scope. Based on what I read in the wiki and in this mail, the scope you have in mind is very similar to where I think we all agree the use cases of web intents predominately lie (edit, pick

Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12

2012-06-06 Thread Greg Billock
Done. Thanks for the reality check. :-) On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Ms2ger wrote: > On 06/06/2012 02:26 AM, Greg Billock wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Deepanshu Gautam >>  wrote: >>> >>> Please refer to the email thread below >

Re: Publish FPWD of Web Intents spec; deadline June 12

2012-06-05 Thread Greg Billock
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Deepanshu Gautam wrote: > Please refer to the email thread below > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2012May/0054.html > > Where a consensus was reached to delete the following statement from the > Suggestions related text. > > "The User Ag

Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting

2012-05-08 Thread Greg Billock
Looks right to me. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 5/8/12 1:11 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > > Greg, Tantek, All - I think there is an error in this part of the draft Web > Intents minutes: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06 > > > tante

Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal

2012-03-07 Thread Greg Billock
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Greg Billock wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: >>> On 3/5/2012 5:56 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Ch

Re: Transferable and structured clones, was: Re: [FileAPI] Deterministic release of Blob proposal

2012-03-06 Thread Greg Billock
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: > On 3/5/2012 5:56 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: >> >> Do you see old behavior working something like the following? >> >> >> var blob = new Blob("my new big blob"); >> var keepBlob =

Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter

2011-11-17 Thread Greg Billock
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: > ** > Does anybody use registerProtocolHandler in any real sense? Is > registerContentHandler needed? It seems like Web Intents is an evolution on > the concept. I don't think we're going to see convergence on those old > methods. I'm rea

Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter

2011-11-13 Thread Greg Billock
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Rich Tibbett wrote: > Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > >> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Rich Tibbett a écrit : >> >>> Hi >>> a.) to register a URL endpoint as an intent provider the user must visit >>> a web page (presumably hosted by the target devic