It could be worse! After 15 years and a handful of vendor
implementations over the years, neither W3C nor WHATWG have simple
microphone upload in forms. There's
http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/camera/ of course, which has been almost
there since around 2007, but still doesn't say what "capture control
rations section, too.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:47 AM, wrote:
> Hi Dom,
>
> I think we also briefly tackled the issue of making the FormatData
> attribute of the MediaFile interface read-only (in File all attributes
> are read-only [1]). Was there a d
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> There are some advantages with , but overall the design is ugly.
is buffered, which would seem to exclude the
possibility of onchange=form.submit() in any of its forms' elements,
but is otherwise parsimonious, while is its unbuffered
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> On 6/14/10, James Salsman wrote:
>>
>>>... I [had been earlier] persuaded that the device element is
>>> unnecessary, given recent announcements for the input type=file
>>> accept="...;s
Are further discussions of input type=file accept=... supposed to
occur on the dap or webapps list?
