Re: Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

I just saw Dimitri's reference to my “Filling slots in shadow” blog posts from a while back, so I thought I’d follow up with the experiences I’ve had I wrote it. First, I remain convinced that it will be very helpful for Shadow DOM to provide a feature like this that allows for parent and child

Re: Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements)

Dimitri: Okay, I can follow up with Ryosuke. I’m happy to share our thoughts and needs for subclassing components. Anne/Steve: I’d originally indicated that this technique couldn't be applied to extending native HTML elements. Since the two of your seemed interested in that, I spent some time t

Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution

Hi Tab, Thanks for your feedback! A primary motivation for proposing names instead of CSS selectors to control distribution is to enable subclassing. We think it’s important for a subclass to be able to override a base class insertion point. That seems easier to achieve with a name. It lets co

Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution

Ugh, hit send too fast. In the university site example below, the instance should have been written: Faculty –Jan > On Apr 22, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Jan Miksovsky wrote: > > Hi Tab, > > Thanks for your feedback! > > A primary motivation for proposing names instea

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a Doodle poll for this: http://doodle.com/poll/z7qvrafbxw4zyit9. (Chaals: I just noticed you offered to do that as well, but since I’d already set it up, I thought I’d sent it out. Hope that’s okay.) If ev

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

It looks like the best date/time for everyone is this coming Tuesday, April 5, 10:00 am – 12:00 pm PDT. Thanks for everyone who participated in the poll. I was not able to find a time when everyone could join, but it appears that we have representation from Apple, Google, and Mozilla, so I thin

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

I never use WebEx, and had proposed Google Hangouts only because I thought it was ubiquitous (and free). I have no idea how to settle this question. If everyone else is happy using WebEx, and someone else can set up the video call, I certainly don’t have a problem with that. (My only issue woul

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

I’m unfamiliar with WebEx. If Chaals or someone wants to make a strong push to use that, please set up the call and send out instructions for joining. Baring that, I propose the default meeting location is on Google Hangouts: https://hangouts.google.com/call/rwiluf6hlbhkzf4566hq4biedye

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

Thanks to everyone who participated in the call. (Special thanks to those calling from Tokyo!) Minutes for the meeting are at https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-webapps-minutes.html .