W dniu 15 sierpnia 2008 06:05 użytkownik Marcos Caceres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisaÅ:
> HI Krzysztof,
> Just a friendly reminder that we (WebApps) are waiting for you to
> respond to the LC comments. Can you please let me know either way if
> you are planning to respond or not. If you are, I would
> I'm not familiar with XPath's usage of the term. Please explain why this
> is a problem for two completely orthogonal specs to define the same term
> with different meaning?
Well, it's potentially confusing, I can easily imagine e.g. myself having to
say "context node (in CSS sense)", and I s
Lachlan,
Thanks for replying quickly; I'll do the same, since it probably matters much
more to you, process-wise.
> I have changed it to the
> plural "nodeâs subtrees". Is that acceptable?
Yes, perfectly. But this still isn't formally applicable in all cases:
> The term document order means
Yes, I'm satisfied with all the changes (although I still think it's useless
and a bit risky of minor discrepancies to define document order when DOM Level
3 Core is already normatively referenced), thank you for being so responsive
and for the entirety of your effort on this spec.
This makes m
