LCWD comments

2010-06-30 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
. However, those APIs would operate on nodes floating in the air, unrelated to any document possibly opened. 17. Isn't there already something like WorkerLocation specced? Best regards, Krzysztof Maczyński Invited Expert, HTML WG

Moving Window and stuff out of HTML5

2009-11-19 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
missing piece in Web scripting, and currently only in SVG (at least as W3C specs go, and of course unless I'm missing something) can it be used legally (e.g. expecting a property called document on the global object if the language is ECMAScript). Best regards, Krzysztof Maczyński Invited Expert

LCWD comment on Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy - reference RFC 2817

2009-08-05 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
Informative references include RFC 2818. Please also include RFC2817, as it's preferable on architectural grounds (the https scheme is believed to be a mistake because it has semantics equivalent to http).

Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

2009-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
Yes, I'm satisfied with all the changes (although I still think it's useless and a bit risky of minor discrepancies to define document order when DOM Level 3 Core is already normatively referenced), thank you for being so responsive and for the entirety of your effort on this spec. This makes

Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

2009-01-30 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
Lachlan, Thanks for replying quickly; I'll do the same, since it probably matters much more to you, process-wise. I have changed it to the plural node’s subtrees. Is that acceptable? Yes, perfectly. But this still isn't formally applicable in all cases: The term document order means a

Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD

2008-08-19 Thread Krzysztof Maczyński
W dniu 15 sierpnia 2008 06:05 użytkownik Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: HI Krzysztof, Just a friendly reminder that we (WebApps) are waiting for you to respond to the LC comments. Can you please let me know either way if you are planning to respond or not. If you are, I would really