Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

2016-03-20 Thread Richard Maher
case, without calling the w3c a mafia, > people might actually engage this more seriously. As of right now, I can't > speak for everyone, but I definitely don't like your tone. > > Thanks, > Nick Dugger > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 1:52 AM Anders Rundgren < >

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

2016-03-19 Thread Richard Maher
wistfully off camera, but I'm motivated by results and not married to the process. HTML5 - Web Apps "The journey is *NOT* the destination! On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 16/03/2016 04:46, Richard Maher wrote: > ... > >> Anyway, if the decor

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

2016-03-18 Thread Richard Maher
really surprised that someone owning the implementation will pull out their sword and opt for results over process? On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-03-17 06:00, Richard Maher wrote: > >> Hi Patrick (Congratulations

Re: HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

2016-03-15 Thread Richard Maher
know when you’ll have to trade from a deserted island. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Jake Archibald wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 at 12:14 Richard Maher wrote: > >> Your willingness, nay preference, to serve up stale, outdated data, is an >> exercise in self-flagellation

HTML5's Offline-first Council of Trent

2016-03-15 Thread Richard Maher
I was going to post this as a reply to #844 (*) but this topic is a far greater and more of an all-encompassing issue than any single thread can serve. We (all HTML5 Web-App developers) desperately need a schism from the heretical forces of

Re: Meeting at TPAC - need to plan space.

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Maher
ference members between sessions is sure to be a hoot! As of last night Jake Archibald is penciled in for the keynote but it's not too late to throw your hat in the ring! Cometh the hour . . . Cheers Richard Maher On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Chaals McCathie Nevile < cha...@yan

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

2016-02-22 Thread Richard Maher
I found a very interesting, and inspiring quote today that I'd like to share with you: - https://twitter.com/jaffathecake Googler. "I want the web to do everything native can, and fast." So can anyone here explain to me how that precludes device/user tracking? Or how HTML5 Web Apps can not be av

Re: [geolocation] New Working Group Technical Report - Background GPS

2016-02-16 Thread Richard Maher
Like the Push API the default must be DO NOT track in the background. If the user chooses the individual APP settings then they can turn it on? On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Richard Maher wrote: > Hi, > > I have no experience with how a W3C standard gets off the ground, or an &g

[geolocation] New Working Group Technical Report - Background GPS

2016-02-16 Thread Richard Maher
PI and microphone access PS. Mozilla is also floundering: -https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216148https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784505 Thanks for listening. Cheers Richard Maher

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

2016-02-11 Thread Richard Maher
Look I %100 acknowledge the problem(s) @martinthomson highlights, and the need to prevent abuse from the black hats. All I’m saying is let’s work the problem rather than simply rocking in the foetal position, or worse, concocting artificial and exaggerated speed-humps on the release path of much ne

Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745)

2016-02-10 Thread Richard Maher
@martinthomson I hate to make this a point of jurisdiction, but I think that this is a discussion that needs to be had in the geolocation working group. I've been careful to avoid any demarcation issues by always involving the Service Worker AND GeoLocation comm

New Service Worker Event from GeoLocation

2016-02-10 Thread Richard Maher
" you know it makes sense? Cheers Richard Maher