I'm tracking the state of requests for 'appearance' here:
https://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui#appearance
Feel free to directly edit that wiki page and add more concrete data /
research that you think will help make a decision in terms of design
etc.
For now, there is insufficient data to show an
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 11/7/14 9:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
>>> what you do want.)
>>
>> I would prefer just Moz
Art, WebAppsWG:
THIS IS A STATIC STATUS SNAPSHOT EMAIL AND THUS MAY BE OUT OF DATE.
PLEASE REFERENCE THE LIVING STATUS HERE:
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/PubStatus/Fullscreen
= STATIC SNAPSHOT 2014-295 =
Status of Fullscreen:
Just as the CSSWG already resolved[1], the WebApp
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> I suppose it makes sense to update the W3C copy of the spec once it's
>> ready to go to last call. Until then, I encourage everyone to use to
>>
Hi Art,
I suppose it makes sense to update the W3C copy of the spec once it's
ready to go to last call. Until then, I encourage everyone to use to
the WHATWG living standard:
http://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
Thanks,
Tantek
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Tantek,
Looks right to me also. s/opendoc/OpenDoc [1] and s/ola/OLE [2]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDoc
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Linking_and_Embedding
-t
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Greg Billock wrote:
> Looks right to me.
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Arthur Barstow
