http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10430
Summary: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear IDBRequests
can be reused and spec readyState's behavior
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Al
Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
Also, what happens if someone does the following:
request = objectStore.openCursor();
request.onsuccess(function() {
event.result.continue();
request.abort();
event.result.continue();
}
Also, is it possible to get the
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
>
> Also, what happens if someone does the following:
> request = objectStore.openCursor();
> request.onsuccess(function() {
> event.result.continue();
> request.abor
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
>> Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
>>
>> Also, what happens if someone does the following:
>> request = objectStore.openCursor();
>> request.onsuccess
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
> Also, what happens if someone does the following:
> request = objectStore.openCursor();
> request.onsuccess(function() {
> event.result.continue();
> request.abort()
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
> > Also, what happens if someone does the following:
> > request = objectStore.openCursor();
> > request.onsuccess
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > Also, the constants for the ready state should start with 0, not 1.
>> > Also, what happens if someone does the following:
I asked whether LOADING should be 0 rather than 1. (There is no 0 constant
since we removed INITIAL.)
I also asked " is it possible to get the IDBRequest object from within the
openCursor/continue events without saving it off somewhere? If not, it
probably should be."
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> I asked whether LOADING should be 0 rather than 1. (There is no 0 constant
> since we removed INITIAL.)
I agree with this.
> I also asked " is it possible to get the IDBRequest object from within the
> openCursor/continue events without sav
Actually, what's the use case for readyState? I can't think of any uses
that we'd want to encourage. Maybe we should just remove it.
J
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:50 PM, wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10430
>
> Summary: [IndexedDB] We need to make it more clear
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Actually, what's the use case for readyState? I can't think of any uses
> that we'd want to encourage. Maybe we should just remove it.
The use-case that I've heard in similar situations goes something like this:
Code makes a request and at
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > Actually, what's the use case for readyState? I can't think of any uses
> > that we'd want to encourage. Maybe we should just remove it.
>
> The use-case that I've heard in similar si
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > Actually, what's the use case for readyState? I can't think of any uses
>> > that we'd want to encourage. Maybe we should ju
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > Actually, what's the use case for readyState? I can't thin
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Jeremy Orlow
>> >> wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jonas Sicking
> wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow
>> >> wro
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonas Sicking
>
On 11/1/2010 5:29 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
If not, I think we should avoid adding surface area for something we don't
really understand very well.
I agree with this. Less is better at this point I think (when
appropriate, of course).
Cheers,
Shawn
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptograp
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
> On 11/1/2010 5:29 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>>
>> If not, I think we should avoid adding surface area for something we
>> don't
>> really understand very well.
>
> I agree with this. Less is better at this point I think (when appropriate,
> of
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
> > On 11/1/2010 5:29 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >>
> >> If not, I think we should avoid adding surface area for something we
> >> don't
> >> really understand very well.
> >
> > I agree
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
>> > On 11/1/2010 5:29 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If not, I think we should avoid adding surface area for something we
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher
> wrote:
> >> > On 11/1/2010 5:29 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Wilsher
>> >> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > Also, do any of those examples have just 2 states?
>
> No.
Early drafts of several of them just had two states, actually, but in each
case we ended up adding more later.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
25 matches
Mail list logo
