On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>
> This made me wonder about this:
>
> > When support for a feature is disabled (e.g. as an emergency measure
> > to mitigate a security problem, or to aid in development, or for
> > performance reasons), user agents must act as if they had no support
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I agree that it's the path of least resistance. I also believe it's
> the best solution overall.
It's true that an ugly solution is still the best one, but note that
the likely end result seems very similar: discouraging people from
using
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
>> FWIW, the Chrome team has come down pretty hard on the side of not ever
>> leaking to apps that the user is in incognito mode, for precisely the
>> reasons described previously. Incogni
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> FWIW, the Chrome team has come down pretty hard on the side of not ever
> leaking to apps that the user is in incognito mode, for precisely the
> reasons described previously. Incognito mode loses much of its utility if
> pages are able to scr
FWIW, the Chrome team has come down pretty hard on the side of not ever
leaking to apps that the user is in incognito mode, for precisely the
reasons described previously. Incognito mode loses much of its utility if
pages are able to screen for it and block access.
I do think there's a user educat
(Note that this is from a ticket; the OP probably won't see replies here.)
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:46 PM, João Eiras wrote:
> When the user open a tab in private mode, he/she knows that data will not be
> stored, therefore there is no need for the webpage to reiterate that. It
> would be awkwar
Both Firefox and Chrome offer users privacy features which will cause Web
Storage to be non-persistent across browser restart. For example Firefox has a
"Never remember history" option, and Chrome has a "clear cookies and other data
when I close my browser" option.
For an application developer,
This made me wonder about this:
> When support for a feature is disabled (e.g. as an emergency measure to
> mitigate a security problem, or to aid in development, or for performance
> reasons), user agents must act as if they had no support for the feature
> whatsoever, and as if the feature wa
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11606
Summary: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Pr
