Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in comment #5 (use
DOMString instead of any in {get,set}Item).
AFAIU, PLH's proposal matches what has been widely implemented. As such,
it seems like the spec should be updated accordingly.
-AB
On Jun/2/2011 8:31 AM, ext bugzi...@jessica.w3.org
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in comment #5 (use
DOMString instead of any in {get,set}Item).
AFAIU, PLH's proposal matches what has been widely implemented. As such,
it seems like the spec should be updated accordingly.
This isn't
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:38 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in comment #5 (use
DOMString instead of any in {get,set}Item).
AFAIU, PLH's proposal matches what has been widely implemented. As such,
it
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:38 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in comment #5 (use
DOMString instead of any in {get,set}Item).
AFAIU, PLH's proposal
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:51 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
I don't believe that this new feature will get implemented. It's going
to break too many pages on the Web,
That's the kind of thing implementation feedback will determine.
You've got that feedback already. See
On Jun/2/2011 2:51 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:38 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in comment #5 (use
DOMString instead of any in
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On Jun/2/2011 2:51 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:38 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All - PLH proposed a fix for this bug in
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:51 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
I don't believe that this new feature will get implemented. It's going
to break too many pages on the Web,
That's the kind of thing implementation feedback will determine.
You've
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 19:00 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 18:51 +, Ian Hickson wrote:
I don't believe that this new feature will get implemented. It's going
to break too many pages on the Web,
That's the kind
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
That isn't implementor feedback, and it says nothing about the volume of
breakage. If Aryeh is the only person affected, then I'm sure he'd agree
with me that that means we can change this without worry.
I do agree, but I don't
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+w3c...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
12 matches
Mail list logo
