Re: [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates

2011-06-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
Adrian - this bug is for the Web Sockets API spec (and not Web Storage), correct? On Jun/8/2011 1:21 PM, ext bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 Summary: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for

RE: [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates

2011-06-10 Thread Adrian Bateman
On Friday, June 10, 2011 7:05 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Adrian - this bug is for the Web Sockets API spec (and not Web Storage), correct? On Jun/8/2011 1:21 PM, ext bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 Yes - corrected now, thanks!

[Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates

2011-06-08 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12913 Summary: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: