Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

2009-04-29 Thread timeless
also note that this would mean that a web site could try to knock out other web based mashups that it didn't like. i'm sure that browser vendors can provide an api for their debugging clients, but this feature shouldn't be exposed to web content.

RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

2009-04-28 Thread Travis Leithead
that returns a static/dynamic list of event handlers for a given object that supports the EventTarget interface rest of conversation snipped Action page: http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/actions/267 Mail thread view on nabble: http://www.nabble.com/-DOML3Events--ACTION-267-Proposal-for-event-iterator-t

Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

2009-04-28 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: I think this was dropped because it would allow general web apps to inspect (and remove?) event handlers that were registered by code running in extensions or by the browser itself. In general, this is a

Re: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

2009-04-28 Thread João Eiras
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:57:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: I think this was dropped because it would allow general web apps to inspect (and remove?) event handlers that were registered by

RE: [DOML3Events] ACTION-267 Proposal for event iterator

2009-04-25 Thread Mike Wilson
/dynamic list of event handlers for a given object that supports the EventTarget interface rest of conversation snipped Action page: http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/actions/267 Mail thread view on nabble: http://www.nabble.com/-DOML3Events--ACTION-267-Proposal-for-event-iterator-t d16593177