On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Pablo Castro wrote:
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:59 AM
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Nikunj Mehta nik...@o-micron.com wrote:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Pablo Castro wrote:
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:59 AM
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
Making sure I get the essence of this thread: we're saying that cursors
see live changes as they happen on objects that are after the object
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:04 AM
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
If it's accurate, as a
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:04 AM
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:59 AM
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Orlow
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:04 AM
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com
wrote:
On
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
Making sure I get the essence of this thread: we're saying that cursors see
live changes as they happen on objects that are after the object you're
currently standing on; and of course, any other activity within a transaction
sees all the changes that happened before that activity took place.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
Making sure I get the essence of this thread: we're saying that cursors see
live changes as they happen on objects that are after the object you're
currently standing on;
Yes.
and of course, any other activity
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri,
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi All,
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In
short, what should happen if an object store is modified while a
cursor is iterating it? Note that the modification can be done within
the same transaction, so the read/write locks preventing several
transactions from
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In short,
what should happen if an object store is modified while a cursor is
iterating
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
We ran into an complicated issue while implementing IndexedDB. In short,
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:00 PM
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
wrote:
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Pablo Castro
pablo.cas...@microsoft.com
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Andrei Popescu andr...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
