On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Pablo Castro
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Pablo Castro <
> pablo.cas...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
> >> Orlow
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Pablo Castro
> wrote:
>>
>> From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
>> Orlow
>> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:35 AM
>>
>> >>In another thread (in the last couple days) we
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Pablo Castro
wrote:
>
> From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy
> Orlow
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:35 AM
>
> >>In another thread (in the last couple days) we actually decided to remove
> timeouts from normal transactions s
From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:35 AM
>>In another thread (in the last couple days) we actually decided to remove
>>timeouts from normal transactions since they can be implemented as a
>>setTimeout+abort.
>>
>>But
In another thread (in the last couple days) we actually decided to remove
timeouts from normal transactions since they can be implemented as a
setTimeout+abort.
But I agree that we need a way to abort setVersion transactions before
getting the callback (so that we implement timeouts for them as we
Regular transactions take a timeout parameter when started, which ensures that
we eventually make progress one way or the other if there's an un-cooperating
script that won't let go of an object store or something like that.
I'm not sure if we discussed this before, it seems that we need to add