On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Ryan Seddon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Gregg wrote:
>
>> After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a
>> new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/pu
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Gregg wrote:
> After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a
> new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/
>
Not sure if this has been asked before but what ab
This looks good. One thing which I suggested previously but which didn't
make it into the spec is the ability for the UA to eliminate duplicate
notifications. Since I've been using the existing experimental notifications
API in Chrome, I've found that duplicate notifications are very common and
qui
On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:33 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Currently there are no processing requirements for the mime argument of
> createWebNotification(), do we really need it?
Do we have use cases for content other than HTML or SVG? Presumably those can
"just work".
> Should we really put anoth
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:06:45 +0100, John Gregg wrote:
After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a
new draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/
The Web IDL should be cleaned up:
* There is no s
After the extensive discussion several weeks ago, I've been working on a new
draft for Web Notifications which is now available at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/
The most substantial changes are:
- Add requirements section. This is derived from the wiki page which Doug
S
