On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi Marcos - given this spec is in the Candidate Recommendation state, before
a CfC to publish a new LCWD is started, I think it would be helpful if you
provided a list of the changes you propose and a short summary for
Hi Marcos - given this spec is in the Candidate Recommendation state,
before a CfC to publish a new LCWD is started, I think it would be
helpful if you provided a list of the changes you propose and a short
summary for each change. WDYT?
I don't have a strong opinion on where the list of
On 6/3/11 1:39 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Marcos - given this spec is in the Candidate Recommendation state,
before a CfC to publish a new LCWD is started, I think it would be
helpful if you provided a list of the changes you propose and a short
summary for each change. WDYT?
I don't have a
Quote from WARP:
Let sub domains be the result of applying the rule for getting a
single attribute value to the value of the subdomains attribute. If
the value of sub domains is not a valid boolean value, then this
element is in error and the user agent MUST ignore this element.
subdomains has
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Marcos Caceres marcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote from WARP:
Let sub domains be the result of applying the rule for getting a
single attribute value to the value of the subdomains attribute. If
the value of sub domains is not a valid boolean value, then
On 6/2/11 5:13 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Marcos Caceresmarcosscace...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote from WARP:
Let sub domains be the result of applying the rule for getting a
single attribute value to the value of the subdomains attribute. If
the value of sub
