[WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-11-20 Thread Marcin Hanclik
Hi All, As discussed on the yesterday's call, I committed to CVS the WARP spec with the section about local network (required for UPnP use cases) at: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access-upnp/ Handling of local network is based on my proposal from [1]. Thanks, Marcin [1] http://lists.w3.o

Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-11-30 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Marcin, On Nov 20, 2009, at 18:12 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: > As discussed on the yesterday's call, I committed to CVS the WARP spec with > the section about local network (required for UPnP use cases) at: > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access-upnp/ What we discussed on the call was actua

RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-01 Thread Marcin Hanclik
+49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com -Original Message- From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@berjon.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:24 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps Subject: Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19

Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-02 Thread Robin Berjon
On Dec 1, 2009, at 22:22 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: >>> Can you please update this to just be a delta? > As far as I know W3C specs, delta documents are usually errata or WG Notes. What we have been calling delta specification in WebApps are specifications that add to another. For instance, WARP add

RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-02 Thread Marcin Hanclik
-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com -Original Message- From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@berjon.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:22 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Arthur Barstow; public-webapps Subject: Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19

Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-02 Thread Robin Berjon
On Dec 2, 2009, at 14:48 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: > Ok, I agree. I will then add an excerpt about the "local" special value and > its processing model. Great! > It will be potentially extremely short. There's nothing wrong with that, short specs are good! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/

Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-03 Thread Frederick Hirsch
+1, duplicating material is a recipe for disaster. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:22 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: On Dec 1, 2009, at 22:22 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: Can you please update this to just be a delta? As far as I know W3C specs, delta documents are u

RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference

2009-12-03 Thread Marcin Hanclik
] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference +1, duplicating material is a recipe for disaster. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:22 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > On Dec 1, 2009, at 22:22 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: >&