On Jun 23, 2009, at 18:19 , Glen wrote:
That's surprising. If there are no guidelines, then it won't likely be
avoided in future. We'll end up with all sorts of variations.
We already have all sorts of variations, we're surviving it. It's not
so surprising at all considering how deeply indepe
That's surprising. If there are no guidelines, then it won't likely be
avoided in future. We'll end up with all sorts of variations.
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:17:39 +0200, Glen wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that's what's unfortunate. I just hope that future naming follows
>> a stan
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:17:39 +0200, Glen wrote:
> Yeah, that's what's unfortunate. I just hope that future naming follows
> a standard.
I'm afraid there's no standard for naming, but it would be nice to avoid names
like XMLHttpRequest in the future, yes.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankes
Yeah, that's what's unfortunate. I just hope that future naming follows
a standard.
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:46:35 +0200, Glen wrote:
>> Why are XML and Http capitalized differently? Shouldn't it be
>> XmlHttpRequest?
>
> All I know for sure is that we cannot change this.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:46:35 +0200, Glen wrote:
Why are XML and Http capitalized differently? Shouldn't it be
XmlHttpRequest?
All I know for sure is that we cannot change this. (I.e. it has been
widely deployed and implemented with the current name for nearly a decade.)
--
Anne van Kester
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:46:35 -0400, Glen wrote:
Hi,
Why are XML and Http capitalized differently? Shouldn't it be
XmlHttpRequest?
I don't know. I have a habit of typing XMLHTTPRequest.
--
Michael
Hi,
Why are XML and Http capitalized differently? Shouldn't it be
XmlHttpRequest?
Glen.
