Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-12 Thread Rafael Weinstein
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 3/12/14 10:27 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: > >> SGTM >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Yves Lafon > yla...@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >> On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barsto

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 3/12/14 10:27 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: SGTM On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Yves Lafon > wrote: On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: [[ Work on this document has been discontinued

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-12 Thread Rafael Weinstein
SGTM On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >>> On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: >>> What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-11 Thread Yves Lafon
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTM

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTML and no longer has normative weight. I d

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTML and no longer has normative weight. I don't have a strong preference now and would like

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-27 Thread Rafael Weinstein
What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTML and no longer has normative weight. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 2/26/14 9:43 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/26/14 9:43 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi Robin, Dimitri, All, Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG Note that clearly indicates WebApps' work on the standalone spec has s

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Charles McCathie Nevile
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:47:19 +0100, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was "merged" to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the question "did HTML do somet

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 2/26/14 3:44 PM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was "merged" to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the question "did HTML do something different than what this spec used to say?"). Yes, I agre

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Rafael Weinstein
No objections. It may be useful to mention in the note that the Template spec was "merged" to HTML (as opposed to simply becoming a concern of HTML, which might raise the question "did HTML do something different than what this spec used to say?"). On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Sounds great to me. On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Robin, Dimitri, All, > > Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I think > WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG > Note that clearly indicates WebApps

[admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All, Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid confusion, I think WebApps' last TR of the spec ([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG Note that clearly indicates WebApps' work on the standalone spec has stopped and the feature is now part of HTML5. (T