Sicking; timeless; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in
IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:09 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Israel Hilerio:
Great! I will work with Eliot to update the spec for the two APIs
On Monday, June 13, 2011 1:17 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:53 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
timeless:
would having a field: mandatory which indicates which arguments
(or feature names)
Israel Hilerio:
Great! I will work with Eliot to update the spec for the two APIs
below, including their Synchronous counterparts, with:
---
dictionary IDBDatabaseOptionalParameters {
DOMString keyPath = null;
That would need to be
DOMString? keyPath = null;
(or else just write
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:09 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Israel Hilerio:
Great! I will work with Eliot to update the spec for the two APIs
below, including their Synchronous counterparts, with:
---
dictionary IDBDatabaseOptionalParameters {
DOMString keyPath = null;
That
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:53 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: timeless:
would having a field: mandatory which indicates which arguments (or
feature names) must be supported by the implementation assuage your
concern?
createObjectStore(car, { mandatory: [foreignKeys], keyPath: id,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:53 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: timeless:
would having a field: mandatory which indicates which arguments (or
feature names) must be supported by the implementation assuage your
concern?
On 6/6/2011 12:03 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
Have you considered using the WebIDL dictionary definition as a mechanism to
define the optional parameters in the IDBDatabase.createObjectStore method?
I don't believe this was available when we added this. Changing this
seems sensible to me.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Is this what you were thinking?
yes
On Monday, June 06, 2011 3:25 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
I don't know about other APIs. But it does seem very unfortunate to
simply silently ignore unknown arguments to
IDBDatabase.createObjectStore. Though then again, extra (and thus
unknown) arguments are ignored to all
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Monday, June 06, 2011 3:25 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
I don't know about other APIs. But it does seem very unfortunate to
simply silently ignore unknown arguments to
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
For example, say that we in version 2 of indexedDB add support for
foreign keys. So that you can say:
createObjectStore(car, { keyPath: id, foreignKeys: [{keyPath:
brand, objectStore: car-brands}]);
It seems bad that if a
timeless:
would having a field: mandatory which indicates which arguments (or
feature names) must be supported by the implementation assuage your
concern?
createObjectStore(car, { mandatory: [foreignKeys], keyPath: id,
foreignKeys: [{keyPath: brand, objectStore: car-brands}]);
Certainly
Have you considered using the WebIDL dictionary definition as a mechanism to
define the optional parameters in the IDBDatabase.createObjectStore method?
Advantages at using the dictionary definition on WebIDL for optional parameters:
. Provides a fixed, ordered set of key-value pairs
. Removes
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
Have you considered using the WebIDL dictionary definition as a mechanism to
define the optional parameters in the IDBDatabase.createObjectStore method?
Advantages at using the dictionary definition on WebIDL for
Jonas Sicking:
The one outstanding issue that I know about is that we want IndexedDB
to throw if any unknown parameters are specified. I don't know if
WebIDL dictionaries support those yet. Or if it's something that we
can specify in prose.
I was waiting to see if anyone else had any views on
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Jonas Sicking:
The one outstanding issue that I know about is that we want IndexedDB
to throw if any unknown parameters are specified. I don't know if
WebIDL dictionaries support those yet. Or if it's something that we
Jonas Sicking:
I don't know about other APIs. But it does seem very unfortunate to
simply silently ignore unknown arguments to
IDBDatabase.createObjectStore. Though then again, extra (and thus
unknown) arguments are ignored to all other DOM calls.
Right (not as defined in Web IDL at the
17 matches
Mail list logo
