Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5)

2009-12-15 Thread Julian Reschke
Robin Berjon wrote: Hi Julian, On Dec 15, 2009, at 17:34 , Julian Reschke wrote: Robin Berjon wrote: It seems that we seriously need a finding explaining to specification authors that creating new terms where existing widely used ones can be made to work is a bad idea that will most likely f

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5)

2009-12-15 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Julian, On Dec 15, 2009, at 17:34 , Julian Reschke wrote: > Robin Berjon wrote: >> It seems that we seriously need a finding explaining to specification >> authors that creating new terms where existing widely used ones can be made >> to work is a bad idea that will most likely fail. Most tec

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5)

2009-12-15 Thread Julian Reschke
Robin Berjon wrote: Dear Larry, thank you for your comments. On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote: 5) ** EDITORIAL USE OF URI FOR IRI ** "Throughout this specification, wherever the term URI [URI] is used, it can be replaced interchangeably with the term IRI [RFC3987]. All widget

Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5)

2009-11-19 Thread Robin Berjon
Dear Larry, thank you for your comments. On Oct 10, 2009, at 19:44 , Larry Masinter wrote: > 5) ** EDITORIAL USE OF URI FOR IRI ** > > "Throughout this specification, wherever the term URI [URI] is used, it can > be replaced interchangeably with the term IRI [RFC3987]. All widget URIs are > IR