Hi folks,
Attempting to parse the shadow-dom spec to gather test coverage data. Turns out
the markup significantly departs from other specs. Not sure if the spec is
edited using a special tool or by hand.
Regardless, adding a className of "idl" to WebIDL blocks would go a long way.
Think that'
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> Regardless, adding a className of "idl" to WebIDL blocks would go a long way.
>
> Think that's doable?
Sure thing! Please file a bug so we don't forget. It's easy -- click
the "File a bug" button in the top right corner of the spec.
:DG<
Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks.
--tobie
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel (mailto:tobie.lan...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> > Regardless, adding a className of "idl" to WebIDL blocks would
<3
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks.
>
> --tobie
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel > (mailto:tobie.lan...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
