Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Dan Forsberg dfors...@gmail.com wrote: Just standardize the interface to the (SQL) database and let DB vendors create browser plugins. This interface you need to define anyway. Plus, allow DB specific language passing to the plugin (e.g., like SQL). Simple

[webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect?

2009-11-21 Thread Dan Forsberg
Hello, I have a LAMP based database application without JS on my server (well, with PostgreSQL). Now I want to make it Ajax/Offline compliant. I've done all my data manipulation/querying with pre-coded SQL statements into the PHP application. In last week I've tried to find out the right way to

Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect?

2009-11-21 Thread Kris Zyp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Forsberg wrote: Hello, I have a LAMP based database application without JS on my server (well, with PostgreSQL). Now I want to make it Ajax/Offline compliant. I've done all my data manipulation/querying with pre-coded SQL statements into