On 7/26/12 8:41 AM, ext Takashi Toyoshima wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for handling this topic.
I support this change [r1.272] is applied to v1 spec.
OK, thanks for being clear.
Anyone else, especially those that added a comment to bug 17263, have
any feedback on whether or not we should block the W
Hi,
Thank you for handling this topic.
I support this change [r1.272] is applied to v1 spec.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Earlier today, Hixie added ArrayBuffer back to the WebSocket API ED (see
> [r1.272]) as requested in bug [17263] which ATM is Resolved
On 7/25/12 4:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Earlier today, Hixie added ArrayBuffer back to the WebSocket API ED (see
[r1.272]) as requested in bug [17263] which ATM is Resolved/WontFix.
I believe he did this because at least two implementors have publicly
committed to not removing the ability to
Hi All,
Earlier today, Hixie added ArrayBuffer back to the WebSocket API ED (see
[r1.272]) as requested in bug [17263] which ATM is Resolved/WontFix.
Since the CfC to move this spec to CR passed on July 18 (but the CR has
not yet been published), I would appreciate it you would please Raise
