The draft minutes from the September 24 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/24-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 1 October 2009 (the next
Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Widgets Voice Conf
24 Sep 2009
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1199.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/09/24-wam-irc
Attendees
Present
Arve, Jere, AndyB, Frederick, Art, Steven, Benoit
Regrets
Josh, Marcin, Marcos, Robin
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Review and tweak agenda
2. [6]Announcements
3. [7]News/summary from the Widget Testing event
4. [8]widget Interface spec:
5. [9]WARP spec: proposal by Dom to change uri attribute to
"urlpattern";
6. [10]URI Scheme spec: status
7. [11]VM Media Features spec: proposal to publish FPWD
8. [12]AOB
* [13]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
<scribe> Scribe: Art
Date: 24 September 2009
Review and tweak agenda
AB: draft agenda was posted on Sep 23 (
[14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/11
99.html ). During the widget Interface topic we will record the
recent exchanges between Marcos and Marcin as well as the origin
thread from Scott Wilson as a way of capturing ongoing discussions
but we won't deep dive on them given Marcos will not be here today.
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1199.html
Arve: since Marcin and Marcos aren't here, we should probably drop
the VM-I spec today
AB: agree
... so given all of the Regrets, we will have a short call today
Announcements
AB: any short annoucements?
[ None ]
News/summary from the Widget Testing event
AB: a widget testing event was held Sep 21-23 (
[15]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TestWorkshop2009 ). Does
anyone have a summary or news they can share?
... since none of the event's participants are here today, we'll
skip this
[15] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TestWorkshop2009
widget Interface spec:
AB: Marcin and Marcos continue to discuss this thread (
[16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
17.html ).
... Marcin and Marcos continue to discuss this thread (
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
08.html ).
... the last email in this thread is from Scott (
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
20.html ). One question here is "origin of a widget" versus
"instance of widget".
... given Marcos isn't here today, we will drop this now but please
continue to discuss this on public-webapps
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1217.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1208.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1220.html
WARP spec: proposal by Dom to change uri attribute to "urlpattern";
AB: Dom proposed (
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
02.html ) the <access> element's uri attribute be changed to
"urlpattern" citing some related work done by the POWDER WG. Any
comments?
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1202.html
Arve: I'm unsure
... technically, he's probably right
... I agree it describes a URL pattern
... but I am skeptical to this change
AB: given Marcin isn't here today, we will drop this now but please
reply to this proposal on public-webapps
JK: Dom had another suggestion and that was just "pattern"
... I prefer pattern to urlpattern
Arve: let's take this to the mail list
... I need to do some investigation as I can't reach the POWDER
document right now
URI Scheme spec: status
AB: without Robin here today, we'll skip this for today
VM Media Features spec: proposal to publish FPWD
AB: last week we agreed that today we consider if the VM-MF spec was
ready for FPWD (
[20]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-mediafeature.src.html
). Marcin responded earlier today (
[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
52.html ) that he votes for FPWD.
... since then, Robin submitted some comment (
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/12
54.html ). Robin, are any of these mandatory before FPWD
publication?
... I think we need to defer the question is this doc ready for FPWD
... any comments or concerns about that?
[20] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-
mediafeature.src.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1252.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2009JulSep/1254.html
Arve: I don't think we should go to FPWD until we have a chance to
hear from others
AB: anything else on this topic for today?
AOB
AB: any other topics for today?
[ None ]
AB: next meeting is October 1
... meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
