Hi Bryan,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Sullivan, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
> I was starting to respond and thank you for the inclusion in the previous
> email when I saw this... having been out for vacation etc I did not get a
> chance to respond earlier.
>
Yeah... as yo
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:14 PM
To: Sullivan, Bryan
Cc: Arthur Barstow; Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG; Web
Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request
for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements L
st Practices Working Group WG; Web
Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request
for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
Hi Bryan, MWBP WG,
FYI, we discussed the MWBP input in last nights teleconf:
http://lists.w3.org/Archive
Hi Bryan, MWBP WG,
FYI, we discussed the MWBP input in last nights teleconf:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008JulSep/0417.html
In summary, although I had included most of the requirements proposed
by the MWBP WG in the Requirements document, the WebApps WG members
overrode
Hi Bryan, MWBP WG,
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Sullivan, Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Art,
> The MWBP WG consolidated comments are attached as a HTML document.
>
> General comments:
>
> Somewhere, perhaps in section 4.2, there should something about how
> resources (media etc) need t
