Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

2009/3/5 Frederick Hirsch : > yes that has been the case ever since I've started working on this. > > Perhaps there is a W3C standard stylesheet we should be using. I'm not sure > why the spec defines its own styles > No reason, please removed them if they are causing problems. -- Marcos Cacer

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

how about simple italics for code? I'll also look into reducing body text regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: yes that has been the case ever since I've started working on this. Perhaps there is a W3C standard s

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

yes that has been the case ever since I've started working on this. Perhaps there is a W3C standard stylesheet we should be using. I'm not sure why the spec defines its own styles regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere) wro

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

Easier on the eye, but to me it's pretty close to the color of RFC 2119 keyword style (em.ct). Seems like the body text font has grown in size somewhat, compared to other specs. --Jere On 5.3.2009 18.03, "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" wrote: I updated the style for items in the Digi

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

I updated the style for items in the Digital Signature specification to brown. Does this work better? It does not conflict with other color uses as far as I can tell. Please look at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ (refresh) regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Mar

[widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

The minutes from the March 5 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 12 March 2009 (the next