RE: [widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)

2009-02-23 Thread Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
s] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: >January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging >& Configuration spec) > >Hi Mark, > >2009/2/19 Priestley, Mark, VF-Group : >> Hi All, >> >> In the email [1] containing my comments against the LCWD

Re: [widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)

2009-02-22 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Mark, 2009/2/19 Priestley, Mark, VF-Group : > Hi All, > > In the email [1] containing my comments against the LCWD of Widgets 1.0: > Packaging & Configuration spec, I wrote: > >>> 7.10 The access Element >>> The access element defines a network attribute as "A boolean > attribute >>> that indic

[widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)

2009-02-19 Thread Priestley, Mark, VF-Group
Hi All, In the email [1] containing my comments against the LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec, I wrote: >> 7.10 The access Element >> The access element defines a network attribute as "A boolean attribute >> that indicates that the widget might need to access network resources