On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Scott Wilson
wrote:
> In Wookie we just create the widget object in the global scope, and then add
> it as an attribute to the window object. Author scripts can access it either
> by "window.widget" or just plain "widget".
> I wonder though - for authors what should
On 9 Feb 2010, at 09:22, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Cyril Concolato > wrote:
Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato>
wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the wi
On Feb 9, 2010, at 09:54 , Cyril Concolato wrote:
> My mistake. I had not realized that. But again, the question is why put the
> widget object on the window object, apart from it being a black hole. Why not
> put it in the global object. What's wrong with that? It would easier to
> specify. Wha
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Cyril Concolato wrote:
> Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato
>>> wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in
Le 08/02/2010 13:29, Robin Berjon a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
that does not support the window object ?
Yeah, that's a tough one... the s
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 13:51 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
As much as I dislike it, I'm also not that inclined to define what to do for
non-"Window"-based implementations (beyond what we currently have in the spec;
which, I admit, is not much).
I don't think that we could even if
On Feb 8, 2010, at 13:51 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> As much as I dislike it, I'm also not that inclined to define what to do for
> non-"Window"-based implementations (beyond what we currently have in the
> spec; which, I admit, is not much).
I don't think that we could even if we wanted to. Presu
Robin Berjon wrote:
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato wrote:
So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
that does not support the window object ?
Yeah, that's a tough one... the spec says:
"For a widge
On Feb 5, 2010, at 16:18 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato
> wrote:
>> So I'm wondering how should the widget object be implemented in a UA
>> that does not support the window object ?
>
> Yeah, that's a tough one... the spec says:
>
> "For a widget insta
Le 05/02/2010 16:18, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato wrote:
Hi all,
After P&C, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to
check the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem
with the spec. In GPAC, we impleme
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Cyril Concolato wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After P&C, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to
> check the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem
> with the spec. In GPAC, we implement only SVG not HTML5, with the Window
>
Hi all,
After P&C, I'm looking now at the Widget Interface spec, in particular to check
the test suite and produce the implementation report. I have a problem with the
spec. In GPAC, we implement only SVG not HTML5, with the Window object. So I'm
wondering how should the widget object be imple
12 matches
Mail list logo
