This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder? I thought we discussed long ago
it should be removed in favor of a co
On 4/12/12 3:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:26:24 +0200, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
This should make it easier to append limited views; appending the
.buffer is a footgun because it appends the whole buffer.
Why are we still discussing BlobBuilder?
Because it's still in th
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
Gecko code and I was just reviewing a patch to it and saw the API? ;)
Eric, the plan is to remove that from File Writer, no?
I thought we discussed long ago it sh
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Blob with constructor is in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
Right. I'd ended up at the File Writer spec.
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
-Boris
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:58:00 +0200, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 4/12/12 3:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I thought the idea was to not have BlobBuilder at all.
Dunno. Is there content depending on it?
Maybe some browser specific demos or content, it's not implemented by
everyone:
http:/
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>
>> Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
>> Gecko code and I was just reviewing a patch to it and saw the API? ;)
>
>
> Eric, the plan is to r
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren
> wrote:
> > Eric, the plan is to remove that from File Writer, no?
>
> Yes. The next draft I publish will mark it deprecated, and it will
> eventually go away. However, currently at least Gecko and WebKit
> support BlobBuilder, and WebKit d
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:11:38 +0200, Eric U wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:48:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky
wrote:
Because it's still in the current editor's draft and it's still in the
Gecko code and I was just reviewing a patch to it a
On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
length as an additional alternative? This would eliminate the need to create a
view when y
On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:53 PM, David Herman wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
>
>> I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
>
> Would it be possible also to allow passing an ArrayBuffer with an offset and
> length as an additional altern
On Apr 24, 2012, at 7:00 PM, David Herman wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:53 PM, David Herman wrote:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
>>
>>> I intend to add ArrayBufferView as a parameter to the Blob constructor .
>>
>> Would it be possible also to allow passing an Arra
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of
ArrayBuffer, but the read method exposed on FileReader and
FileReaderSync will read files into memory as ArrayBuffers.
Since the constructor is not widely deployed yet
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan <
> aranganat...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of
>> ArrayBuffer, but the read method exposed on FileReader and FileReaderSync
>>
On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
> wrote:
>> The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of ArrayBuffer,
>> but the read method exposed on FileReader and FileReaderSync will read files
>> into memory as
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Arun Ranganathan
wrote:
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:13:42 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
>> wrote:
>>> The constructor will switch to use ArrayBufferView in lieu of ArrayBuffer,
>>> but the read method exposed
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> We should not have readAsArryBufferView since there's a ton of
> different types of ArrayBufferViews. Instead we should just return an
> ArrayBuffer and let people construct ArrayBufferViews or DataViews
> into that as they see fit.
>
It wo
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> We should not have readAsArryBufferView since there's a ton of
>> different types of ArrayBufferViews. Instead we should just return an
>> ArrayBuffer and let people construct Array
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I don't know what you are using as basis for the "it's probably by far
> the most common actual data type" statement.
>
Every multibyte string is an array of bytes. Compressed data is an arrays
of bytes (or rather bitstreams, which are acc
19 matches
Mail list logo
