Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

2012-02-27 Thread Steve VanDeBogart
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote: Hi Brona, For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec):

Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

2012-02-27 Thread Steve VanDeBogart
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Steve VanDeBogart vand...@google.comwrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.comwrote: Hi Brona, For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list

Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

2011-12-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Brona, For mostly historical reasons, WebApps' File* specs still use Tracker rather than Bugzilla (and IIRC, Arun also uses the list archive as well as the spec itself to track issues for the File API spec): http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products For consistency, it would be

Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]

2011-12-21 Thread Bronislav Klučka
Hi Arthur, I do not need them :) that's mainly for editors to keep track in one place :) I just suggest this bug to be fixed and it's silly to spam whole forum because of it :) (I do not have access to file a bug in this W3C tracking tool) Brona On 21.12.2011 13:05, Arthur Barstow wrote: