Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-25 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:19:49 +0300, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3.

CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Arthur Barstow
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3. Web Sockets API http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ 4. Web Storage

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Robin Berjon
On Oct 23, 2009, at 14:19 , Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3. Web Sockets API

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Nikunj R. Mehta
Fine for all except WebDatabase. I notice that its present ED is virtually the same as its FPWD (modulo a new section on data sensitivity). There is no movement on any of the thorny issues - locking granularity, relational model and SQL dialect. I am not sure what benefit is to be achieved

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ 3. Web Sockets API

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: Fine for all except WebDatabase. I notice that its present ED is virtually the same as its FPWD (modulo a new section on data sensitivity). There is no movement on any of the thorny issues - locking granularity, relational model and

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread イアンフェッティ
I also support publishing a new WD on all of these. 2009/10/23 Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: Fine for all except WebDatabase. I notice that its present ED is virtually the same as its FPWD (modulo a new section on data sensitivity).

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of the following specs: 1. Server-Sent Events http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ 2. Web Database

Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October

2009-10-23 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:30 AM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote: Fine for all except WebDatabase. I notice that its present ED is virtually the same as its FPWD (modulo a new section on data sensitivity). There is no movement on any of the thorny issues - locking granularity, relational model and SQL