RE: Custom elements contentious bits

2015-12-28 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Brian Kardell [mailto:bkard...@gmail.com] > I'd really like to understand where things really are with async/sync/almost > sync - does anyone have more notes or would they be willing to provide more > exlpanation?  I've read the linked contentious bit and I'm still not sure > that I unde

Re: Custom elements contentious bits

2015-12-10 Thread Brian Kardell
rough and expanded on the issues he put together, with the result at > https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/wiki/Custom-Elements:-Contentious-Bits. > It morphed into a kind of agenda for the meeting, containing "Previously > contentious bits", "Contentious bits", "Othe

Re: Custom elements contentious bits

2015-12-10 Thread Anne van Kesteren
gt; https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/wiki/Custom-Elements:-Contentious-Bits. > It morphed into a kind of agenda for the meeting, containing "Previously > contentious bits", "Contentious bits", "Other things to work out", and "Other > issues worth

Re: Custom elements contentious bits

2015-12-06 Thread Dylan Barrell
ements, in preparation for our January F2F. Today I went through > and expanded on the issues he put together, with the result at > https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/wiki/Custom-Elements:-Contentious-Bits. > It morphed into a kind of agenda for the meeting, containing "Previously &g