On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
> This feedback is a bit vague.
Does http://the-pastry-box-project.net/anne-van-kesteren/2013-september-2/
help illustrate it a bit?
>> I think you should describe the underlying model for Blob/File so
>> other specifications can more easi
Anne,
This feedback is a bit vague.
> I think you should describe the underlying model for Blob/File so
> other specifications can more easily hook into it. E.g. if I want to
> represent a File object with a name /x/ and type /y/ there's not a
> clear way to do that right now. This also leads
I think you should describe the underlying model for Blob/File so
other specifications can more easily hook into it. E.g. if I want to
represent a File object with a name /x/ and type /y/ there's not a
clear way to do that right now. This also leads to issues such as it
not being clear what the val
