On 2.7.2013 2:53, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> a. it's not possible, even in Selectors API 2 [5], to resolve arbitrary
>namespaces in querySelectorAll()
In general this might be problem, but for ITS I don't see this as a
problem. People who use ITS with non-HTML content (various flavours of
XML) w
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Daniel Glazman
wrote:
> On 02/07/13 09:16, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> Pseudo-elements do exist in the document tree as far as layout is
>> concerned.
>
> No, they do not. They don't create new nodes (yet), even shadow nodes,
> they can't be serialized. They belong to
On 02/07/13 09:16, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Pseudo-elements do exist in the document tree as far as layout is
concerned.
No, they do not. They don't create new nodes (yet), even shadow nodes,
they can't be serialized. They belong to the layout tree, NOT the
document tree.
Selectors can indeed a
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Daniel Glazman
wrote:
> On 02/07/13 04:46, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> That's already the case - the subject indicator has to precede the
>> compound selector.
>
> Tab, I know, *I* designed the subject indicator *exactly* the way it
> is in the spec back in *1997* in
On 02/07/13 04:46, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
That's already the case - the subject indicator has to precede the
compound selector.
Tab, I know, *I* designed the subject indicator *exactly* the way it
is in the spec back in *1997* in a language called STTS and an
application implementing it...
I m
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 19:46 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
[...]
> If you want Selectors to be able to select attribute nodes, address it
> directly with a new selector. This should not be smuggled in via the
> subject indicator.
Maybe it would be simpler to support an XPath() selector?
When you s
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Glazman
wrote:
> 1. only one subject indicator is allowed per compound selector
That's already the case - the subject indicator has to precede the
compound selector.
> 2. the subject indicator can precede a universal selector (potentially
> omitted
On 02/07/13 02:53, Daniel Glazman wrote:
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its";
version="2.0"
queryLanguage="css">
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/>
Sorry, the above is obviously wrong, please read
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its";
version=
ITS 2.0 (the Internationalization Tag Set 2.0) [1] is a specification
attaching l10n/i18n properties to elements and attributes of a document
tree through two means:
1. locally, using attributes in the ITS namespace
2. globally, using rules expressed in XML in the ITS namespace and
bas
