>> - synchronous api
>>
>> Thanks
>> -pablo
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Pablo Castro
>> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:39 PM
>> To: Jere
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
> > Propose:
> > can implementors provide an update on their implementation status/plans?
>
> I can answer this for Firefox. We're tracking the spec fairly closely,
> though not all changes
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
> Propose:
> can implementors provide an update on their implementation status/plans?
I can answer this for Firefox. We're tracking the spec fairly closely,
though not all changes have yet landed but are stuck waiting for
review from me.
There
ation/concurrent aspects
>>> - transactions scopes (dynamic support)
>>> - synchronous api
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -pablo
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:
>>> public-webapps-
re storage? And related to
>> this, at some point we discussed temporary vs permanent stores. Close on the
>> whole story of how space is managed.
>> - Database-wide exception handlers
>>
>> Looking forward to the discussion tomorrow.
>>
>> -pablo
>>
es (dynamic support)
> - synchronous api
>
> Thanks
> -pablo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Pablo Castro
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:39 PM
> To: Jeremy Orlow; Jonas Sicking
as a blob (file, array, etc.) as one of its properties?
> >> - Close on collation and international support
> >> - How do applications request that they need more storage? And related
> to
> >> this, at some point we discussed temporary vs permanent stores. Close on
> the
gt; this, at some point we discussed temporary vs permanent stores. Close on the
>> whole story of how space is managed.
>> - Database-wide exception handlers
>>
>> Looking forward to the discussion tomorrow.
>>
>> -pablo
>>
>>
>> From: public-
Behalf Of Pablo Castro
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:39 PM
> To: Jeremy Orlow; Jonas Sicking
> Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda
>
> A few other items to add to the list to discuss tomorrow:
>
> - Blobs support: have we discussed explicitly how
3.org
Subject: RE: IndexedDB TPAC agenda
A few other items to add to the list to discuss tomorrow:
- Blobs support: have we discussed explicitly how things work when an object
has a blob (file, array, etc.) as one of its properties?
- Close on collation and international support
- How do applica
Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:34 PM
To: Jonas Sicking
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: IndexedDB TPAC agenda
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jo
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > What items should we try to cover during the f2f?
> >> >
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > What items should we try to cover during the f2f?
>> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > P
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > What items should we try to cover during the f2f?
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>
> >> > P.S. I'm happy to discuss all of this f2f tomorrow rather than
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> What items should we try to cover during the f2f?
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> > P.S. I'm happy to discuss all of this f2f tomorrow rather than over
>> > email
>> > now.
>>
>> Speaking of which, would be great
What items should we try to cover during the f2f?
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > P.S. I'm happy to discuss all of this f2f tomorrow rather than over
> email
> > now.
>
> Speaking of which, would be great to have an agenda. Some of the
> bigger items are:
>
> * Dynami
16 matches
Mail list logo