Hi Henri,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Sorry about the slow response time.
No problem. Thank you for taking the time to respond at all.
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 16:07, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> What we are discussing is if Mozilla's solution for signing Zip files
>> (JA
Sorry about the slow response time.
On Feb 12, 2010, at 16:07, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> What we are discussing is if Mozilla's solution for signing Zip files
> (JAR-based) [1] is easier for vendors to implement/maintain and authors to
> deal with when compared to the W3C Widget solution of using
r this scenario ?
Greetings
Andreas
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization
Gesendet: Di, 16. Feb 2010
Von: Marcos Caceres
>
>
> On 12/02/10 3:54 PM, kue...@trustable.de wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > our goal in the OASIS
On 12/02/10 3:54 PM, kue...@trustable.de wrote:
Hi all,
our goal in the OASIS DSS group is make the living with DSig as easy as
possible !
Nice.
That's why we made a spec to easily access a crypto server component by
webservice and forget about signature standards, algorithms, validity d
ed. I
don't think that's much better solution for widgets. It's just strange in other
ways ...
Greetings
Andreas
- original Nachricht --------
Betreff: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering
WebApp WG
Gesendet: Fr, 12. Feb 2010
Von: Marcos
(Dragging Henri Sivonen in, as he originally raised some of the issues
below and I'm sure he would like to be involved. Also dragging Frederick
Hirsch in, as he co-edited Widgets Dig Sig spec and co-editor of the XML
Signature Syntax and Processing Second Edition)
Scott Wilson wrote:
On 11 F
