Re: Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)

2009-07-19 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Cameron McCormack wrote: With that in mind, here is a mostly concrete proposal: * All W3C specs will place interfaces and exceptions at the top level scope (i.e., not in a module). Based on this, I haven't added the text you suggested earlier in the same e-mail

Re: Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)

2009-07-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: With that in mind, here is a mostly concrete proposal: * All W3C specs will place interfaces and exceptions at the top level scope (i.e., not in a module). Ian Hickson: Based on this, I haven't added the text you suggested earlier in the same e-mail about the

Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)

2009-07-03 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I don’t know how important it is to keep the HTML interfaces in the org.w3c.dom.html package, but it definitely seems important to keep DOM Core and Events interfaces in org.w3c.dom and org.w3c.dom.events. Ian Hickson: Why? How does it affect black-box compliance of