On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:33:38 +1100, David Håsäther
wrote:
* Charles McCathieNevile @2008-10-21 12:27:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please have a look
through it
There are two instances
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:10:53 +1100, Garrett Smith
wrote:
...
I've coded to requirements that specify the busy icon being hidden and
a message being shown. In those cases, I wanted a 'done' event.
It would be helpful to have input from HCI and U/X experts. What are
the majority of cases, is
* Charles McCathieNevile @2008-10-21 12:27:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please have a look
through it
There are two instances of "XMLHTTPRequest", which should be
"XMLHttpRequest".
--
Da
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:08:56 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Smith wrot
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:08:56 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure if that is what you want to do before or after
getting the
load/error/abort e
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
I agree. Not sure if that is what you want to do before or after getting the
load/error/abort event though?
I should mention that I'm not particularly married to having thing
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Garrett Smith wrote:
>
> I agree. Not sure if that is what you want to do before or after getting the
> load/error/abort event though?
>
> I should mention that I'm not particularly married to having things one way
> or
Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is
>>> the first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems
>>> very intuitive.
>> I agree that dispatching loadend last makes sense.
>
> Other than "liking the symmetry" can you provide a reason f
Sorry for the slow reply. I have been busy (that's also why I still
haven't edited the minutes to try and make more sense).
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:57:55 +0200, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett Sm
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http:/
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the
>> first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems v
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about
having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the
appropriate abort/error/load event.
However I'm not sure why that way is better? I
Garrett Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
Hopefully this draft is ready for l
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
>>
>> Hopefully this draft is ready for last call.
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please have a look through
it, and if you have any test cases we can set up I would be very grateful
(as would anyone trying to test something as a way of figuring
15 matches
Mail list logo
