OK, just to formally close the loop we will not have a meeting in December.

cheers

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:12:55 +0100, Hayato Ito <hay...@chromium.org> wrote:

Thank you, Ryosuke. I'm fine not to have a meeting in Dec.

Let me add a link to GitHub issue(s) for each item:

1. Clarify focus navigation

I think the following two GitHub issues are good starting points to know
the current status.
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/103
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/126

2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)

https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/79
I think this is the hardest issue for us.

3. Decide on the style cascading order

https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/316
I think everyone can agree on Proposal 1, as I commented in the issue.

4. style inheritance

https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/314
I've already closed this issue. Please feel free to re-open the issue to
restart the discussion.


On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:31 AM Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote:


> On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote:
>> What outstanding problems are you thinking of?
>
> Again, not I, but Hayato Ito raised these. I just happen to agree. He
> emailed this list on November 2:
>
>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0149.html

Of the four issues listed there:

> On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Hayato Ito <hay...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > 1. Clarify focus navigation
> > 2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)
> > 3. Decide on the style cascading order
> > 4. style inheritance (https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/314)

I'd like to resolve 3 and 4 ASAP since we're pretty close. I don't think we necessarily need an in-person meeting to do that though. If anything,
it's probably more helpful to have discussion over mailing lists so that
each person can spend as much time as needed to understand / come up with
examples and proposals.

For 1, we had a rough consensus on how current focus model (in particular
focus ordering) should be changed to support shadow DOM during TPAC.
Namely, we would create a new tab index "scope" at both shadow roots as
well as slots, and follow the composed tree order for tab ordering.  I
think someone should document that first.

I just started working on 2 but I probably won't have a time to come up
with a proposal until mid December.


So if you guys can't make it, I don't think we necessarily need a shadow
DOM meeting in December.

- R. Niwa





--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
 cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Reply via email to