ehalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:38 PM
To: Marcos Caceres
Cc: WebApps WG; public-web-secur...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
* Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
I feel that the goals of this draft are either in
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:50:57 +0200, Hill, Brad
wrote:
I feel that the goals of this draft are either inconsistent with the
basic architecture of the web, cannot be meaningfully accomplished by
the proposed mechanism, or both, and I haven't seen any discussion of
these concerns yet.
It wo
u...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:38 PM
To: Marcos Caceres
Cc: WebApps WG; public-web-secur...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
* Marcos Caceres wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
>> I feel that the
* Marcos Caceres wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
>> I feel that the goals of this draft are either inconsistent with the
>> basic architecture of the web, cannot be meaningfully accomplished
>> by the proposed mechanism, or both, and I haven't seen any discussion
>> of th
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Singer wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:57 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
>>> Well, my disagreement is not with its content; I think we should not move
>>> forward with this spec at all.
>>>
>>> I
On Jul 5, 2011, at 8:57 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
>> Well, my disagreement is not with its content; I think we should not move
>> forward with this spec at all.
>>
>> I feel that the goals of this draft are either inconsistent wit
Hi Brad,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hill, Brad wrote:
> Well, my disagreement is not with its content; I think we should not move
> forward with this spec at all.
>
> I feel that the goals of this draft are either inconsistent with the basic
> architecture of the web, cannot be meaningfull
ut only subject to some policy or set of
> capabilities which guarantee clickjacking protection, visibility, etc.
>
> Brad Hill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: public-web-security-requ...@w3.org
> [mailto:public-web-security-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anne van
&
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:30:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Anne - please add some text re the consensus of the contents point and
then I'll start the CfC.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/from-origin/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Now has "The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the
cons
equ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-web-security-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:23 AM
To: WebApps WG
Cc: public-web-secur...@w3.org
Subject: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
Hi hi,
Is there anyone who has objections against publishing
http://dvcs.w
s WG
Cc: public-web-secur...@w3.org
Subject: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
Hi hi,
Is there anyone who has objections against publishing
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/from-origin/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as a FPWD.
The idea is mainly to gather more feedback to see if there is any interest in
tak
On 6/30/11 10:31 PM, ext Daniel Veditz wrote:
On 6/30/11 9:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
(Added public-web-security because of the potential for doing
this in CSP instead. Though that would require a slight change
of scope for CSP, which I
On 6/30/11 9:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> (Added public-web-security because of the potential for doing
>> this in CSP instead. Though that would require a slight change
>> of scope for CSP, which I'm not sure is actually desirable.)
On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Hi hi,
>
> Is there anyone who has objections against publishing
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/from-origin/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as a FPWD. The
> idea is mainly to gather more feedback to see if there is any interest in
> taking this forw
Hi hi,
Is there anyone who has objections against publishing
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/from-origin/raw-file/tip/Overview.html as a FPWD.
The idea is mainly to gather more feedback to see if there is any interest
in taking this forward.
(Added public-web-security because of the potential for d
15 matches
Mail list logo
