Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest

2009-09-23 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:03:52 +0200, Stewart Brodie stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote: The Abstract is good for an abstract, but I don't think it's got enough detail in it for a list of differences. I'll review the new documents in closer detail when I get a chance and see if I can suggest some

Publishing XMLHttpRequest

2009-08-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
The last XMLHttpRequest Working Draft was a Last Call Working Draft. As it turned out a number of changes had to be made again. Meanwhile HTML5 also got further along and integration with the event loop as well as the storage mutex was desired. These are now integrated. The Forms WG asked for

Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest

2009-08-12 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:09 +0200, Stewart Brodie stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote: Please could you add an appendix in the latter that summarises what's new in the new version? Is there anything the Abstract does not cover you would like to see mentioned? I believe it is true to say that

Re: Publishing XMLHttpRequest

2009-08-12 Thread Stewart Brodie
Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:09 +0200, Stewart Brodie stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote: Please could you add an appendix in the latter that summarises what's new in the new version? Is there anything the Abstract does not cover you would like to see