On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro > wrote:
Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me
busy. I agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread
th
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Pablo Castro
wrote:
> On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro <
> pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
> agree with all
On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro
>> wrote:
>> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
>> agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required,
>> so I won't redundantly
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro wrote:
> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
> agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required,
> so I won't redundantly mark each with "same here", but I have a few comments
> on one or tw
Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I agree
with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required, so I won't
redundantly mark each with "same here", but I have a few comments on one or two
of them below.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
> Thanks for your patience. Most questions below don't seem to need new spec
> text.
>
> On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> I'm sorry that I let so much IndexedDB feedback get backlogged. In the
> future, I'll try to trickle
Thanks for your patience. Most questions below don't seem to need new
spec text.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'm sorry that I let so much IndexedDB feedback get backlogged. In
the future, I'll try to trickle things out slower.
Indexes:
1) Creation of indexes really
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the
> interfaces are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync, and the
> async API portion is FooRequest. This is tr
On Feb 28, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the
interfaces are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync,
and the async API portion is FooRequest. This is true except for
IndexedDatabase where the sync version is s
Another nit: as far as I can tell, all of the common parts of the interfaces
are named Foo, the synchronous API portion is FooSync, and the async API
portion is FooRequest. This is true except for IndexedDatabase where the
sync version is simply IndexedDatabase and the async version is
IndexedData
10 matches
Mail list logo
