On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2011 9:14 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
>> On 17/10/11 7:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > I sort of like the short-cut since it seems like a very common case
>> > for web developers to want to create a transaction which
On Monday, October 17, 2011 9:14 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 17/10/11 7:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > I sort of like the short-cut since it seems like a very common case
> > for web developers to want to create a transaction which only uses a
> > single objectStore.
> >
> > But I agree it's
On 17/10/11 7:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I sort of like the short-cut since it seems like a very common case
for web developers to want to create a transaction which only uses a
single objectStore.
But I agree it's not a huge win for developers as far as typing goes
(two characters).
I *think*
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, October 14, 2011 3:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sickin
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2011 3:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio
> > wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio
On Friday, October 14, 2011 3:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Isr
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio
>> wrote:
>> > On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
>> >> On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking
On Friday, October 14, 2011 2:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> >> On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
>> On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jon
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:15 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> In both the Fire
On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:46 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an
> >> empty array to IDBDatab
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:44 AM, ben turner wrote:
> So it sounds like everyone agrees that accepting an empty array is not
> desired... Can we just make that case throw an exception rather than
> generating an empty transaction (which will then throw when it is
> used)?
I'm fine either way.
/ J
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an empty
>> array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a transaction which has
>> a scope th
So it sounds like everyone agrees that accepting an empty array is not
desired... Can we just make that case throw an exception rather than
generating an empty transaction (which will then throw when it is
used)?
-Ben Turner
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an
> empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a
> transaction which has a scope that covers all objectStores in the
> database.;
>
> This, however, is
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an empty
>> array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a transaction which has
>> a scope th
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:44 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an empty
> array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a transaction which has
> a scope that covers all objectStores in the database. I.e. you can do
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
